On 06/02/2016 04:27 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
It got added to the official website without a real support plan: a
clear commitment was never made to fix Phobos issues, and nobody knew if
we were actually going to transition from ddoc, or live side-by-side, or
what. Certainly, nobody knew when, so there was no sense of urgency to
fix the Phobos source regardless.
It just kinda sat in a dark corner of the website for years with little
attention from the Phobos crew. I doubt many of them use it.
Interestingly it came as encouraging and empowering some fledgling work
that had compelling things going for it (including but not limited to
enthusiastic receipt in this forum), which ironically is exactly what
you just asked for.
Yes, I do wish /library/ were better and got more TLC. But I'm not sorry
for approving it.
Andrei
