On 6/3/2016 2:10 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Actually, I would argue that the moment that Unicode is concerned with what the character actually looks like rather than what character it logically is that it's gone outside of its charter. The way that characters actually look is far too dependent on fonts, and aside from display code, code does not care one whit what the character looks like.
What I meant was pretty clear. Font is an artistic style that does not change context nor semantic meaning. If a font choice changes the meaning then it is not a font.
