On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 02:20:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei posted this on another thread. I felt it deserved its own thread. It's very important.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I go to conferences. Train and consult at large companies. Dozens every year, cumulatively thousands of people. I talk about D and ask people what it would take for them to use the language. Invariably I hear a surprisingly small number of reasons:

* The garbage collector eliminates probably 60% of potential users right off.

* Tooling is immature and of poorer quality compared to the competition.

* Safety has holes and bugs.

* Hiring people who know D is a problem.

* Documentation and tutorials are weak.

* There's no web services framework (by this time many folks know of D, but of those a shockingly small fraction has even heard of vibe.d). I have strongly argued with Sönke to bundle vibe.d with dmd over one year ago, and also in this forum. There wasn't enough interest.

* (On Windows) if it doesn't have a compelling Visual Studio plugin, it doesn't exist.

* Let's wait for the "herd effect" (corporate support) to start.

* Not enough advantages over the competition to make up for the weaknesses above.


(I'm work as a C/C++ programmer for military sector in the area of the information and communication infrastructure and electronic warfare)

When I told of D to my boss he had a couple of reasons why not to use D for development of our products.

* Backward compatibility with existing code.
* D is much more complex than C++
* Not enough tutorials and solved problems in D on stack overflow (LOL) * We have problem to recruit a good C++ not a good D programmer. (1/100 is good)
* My boss does not have free time to learn new things...
* Using GC is strictly prohibited in realtime apps. And D does not have an compiler supported ARC
* D without GC or ARC is not powerful as it can be.
* More and more people are dumber, we must write our programs for later re-usage by any junior what we must employ. C++ is in this way much more easier than D, cuz you know what every line of your program do. Employ C++ junior programmer and let him to learn D and then work on our projects is not a good (and cost-effective) idea. * Not everyone is interested in programming, sometimes people are doing it just for money.

Reply via email to