On 06/11/2016 02:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > I'm fine with generating the docs with ddox if that works better, but I sure > hope that we're not going to then change how we're doing the actual > documenattion in the source files except that if ddox is smart enough that > we don't need many of the linking macros, then I could see getting rid of > some of those from the docs. > > I expect to be able to use version(StdDdoc) and all that and have it do the > right thing with ddox, or the switch to ddox is going to be very annoying > from the standpoint of maintaining the code. However, I would assume that > that's all already been sorted out, since we've been generating the docs > with ddox alongside the normal documentation for some time now. > > - Jonathan M Davis
It already does all of that (uses dmd's json output atm.), and of course has a ddoc macro interpreter built-in (emulating all of it's quirks).
