On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 13:58:29 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
Given the above, I believe we should move forward with `checkedint` as-is. Someone can add a `BoundInt` type to it later, if there is demand.
Ok. Thanks.
- std.experimental.checkedint is rea... Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.checkedi... tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.checkedi... Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.checkedi... Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.chec... Andrea Fontana via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.... Andrea Fontana via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimen... tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.checkedi... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.chec... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.chec... tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.checkedi... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.chec... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.checkedi... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.chec... tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimental.... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.experimen... tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.expe... tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.expe... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.... tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
