On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 00:31:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 23:01:00 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote:
This proves nothing.
This isn't a proof, this is a definition. This is the
definition that is used by all programming languages out there
and all CPUs. It isn't going to change because someone on the
internet think he has a better definition that provide no clear
advantage over the current one.
Again, no proof at all and inaccurate. Not every programming
language or cpu does this. Please don't make up facts to support
your "definitions" and desires. Having a negative modulo is just
ignorant.
