On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 20:12:29 UTC, luminousone wrote:
Is puts high enough latency that, that main thread can fill the message queue faster then start can exhaust it? If you put a call to sleep for 1ms in the main loop does it have the same result?
It appears that adding a 1ms sleep causes the leak to disappear. Still seems like bad behaviour from the GC though, perhaps indicative of a bug.
