On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 18:15:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah it's a bit subtle. That line is in fact pure punctuation, so even though there's no flow through it that's totally fine (as much as you wouldn't expect a line with a "}" to show no coverage). -- Andrei
Not sure if it's pure punctuation. It is after all a statement checking for a condition, i.e. actually doing something. The fact that you bypass this check should not concern -cov, whose job it is to see whether a task is executed or not. You cannot expect -cov to do the optimizer's job on top of that. In fact one could argue that it shouldn't make assumptions.
