On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 00:48:54 UTC, Jason White wrote:
I'm interested in feedback on this library. What is it missing? How can be better?
I think making the actual read/write/open/accept/et.al. functions used to talk to the kernel pluggable would be a good extension point to hook in evented/threaded IO frameworks. This restricts the async integration to synchronous APIs, e.g. suspendable Fibers or async-await, but that might be a reasonable choice over nodejs-style inversion of control.
