On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 at 05:12:13 UTC, mogu wrote:
Link:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0091r1.html
And we have DIP40:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP40
Is someone there to renew it in new DIPs repo? T.T
I'd like to see that move forward, but the way this DIP is doing
it won't cut it.
Defining IFTY for structs and functions independently is a recipe
to have subtle difference between the 2. I'd support a proposal
that define the concept of "Callable" or whatever the name, and
then define IFTI for callables.
