Re: [DIP] In-place struct initialization

[Enamex via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 07:10:46 UTC, cym13 wrote:
The proposed change is litteraly just equivalent to the already 
existing struct initialization, just made usable:

    struct S {
        int a;
        int b;
    }

    auto s = S(b:42);
    // equivalent to
    S s = { b:42 };

Having the possibility to initialize structs without tying them 
to a variable
proves useful when combined with functions that take this 
struct but those
functions aren't directly impacted by the change.

I suggest extending the existing `S s = {field: value}` syntax to 
allow specifying the type itself next to the field list and make 
it usable generally everywhere.

So, instead:

takeThing(Thing{ field: val, num: 43 });

It shouldn't clash with anything else, I think.