Re: Why don't we switch to C like floating pointed arithmetic instead of automatic expansion to reals?

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/4/2016 11:05 PM, Fool wrote:
I understand your point of view. However, there are (probably rare) situations
where one requires more control. I think that simulating double-double precision
arithmetic using Veltkamp split was mentioned as a resonable example, earlier.

There are cases where doing things at higher precision results in double 
rounding and a less accurate result. But I am pretty sure there are far fewer of 
those cases compared to routine computations that get a more accurate result 
with more precision.

If that wasn't true, we wouldn't ever need double precision.