On Thursday, 11 August 2016 at 09:06:50 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
The DIP should make clear that this is wanted for a container
library.
Additionally, I miss how this DIP fits in the overall plan of
getting rid of the GC. As long as there isn't a written
masterplan how to combine those ideas I consider this DIP to be
incomplete.
It's already clear that we need much better escape analysis and
guards for safe reference counting.
There isn't any open question that this is the necessary enabler
for more RC and less GC.
