On 19 August 2016 at 00:50, John Smith via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > Well there are some things I feel could be improved, a lot of the things are > really just minor but what is a deal breaker for me mostly is the compilers. > The GCC and Clang implementations are really far behind in terms of the > version, so they are missing a lot of features. A lot of the features that > I'd want to use D for.
This is a constant vicious cycle. Sometimes I wonder of how better it would be for all if D was instead defined by a spec, not an implementation that adds small feature changes in an ad hoc manner as it sees fit.
