On 08/11/2016 05:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/11/2016 7:34 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
so no actual code would be lost.
Github dlang is our critical infrastructure, we should treat it
accordingly. I agree we wouldn't lose the code history, but would lose
just about everything else. It would take us days, maybe weeks, to get
things set up again.
Why risk it?
That right there is why gitlab is better. I realize it's too late now,
but I kinda wish we had standardized on that instead of github. Unlike
gitlab, github takes all the philosophy, purpose, goals and values of
git (the very tool it's built for) and throws them straight out the
window, replacing them with a traditional, very non-git-like
MS/Facebook-style single-point-of-failure walled garden.
