On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 07:41:35 UTC, w0rp wrote:
I don't think this particular syntax is desirable. We already have ternary expressions, and anything more complicated than a regular ternary should probably be written with a regular series of if statements.
The problem is when you're in the middle of a large expression which you don't want to break apart into statements (it might be the body of a '=>' lambda), your options are ternary conditionals (horrid syntax), or something like `{if (x) {return y;} else {return z;};}()` which is just as bad.
