On 9/6/16 1:01 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06.09.2016 17:23, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/6/16 10:17 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06.09.2016 16:12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with the general principal of the DIP though. I've
never liked comma expressions, and this seems like a waste of syntax.
Won't tuples suffice here when they take over the syntax? e.g. (x, y,
z)[$-1]
(Does not work if x, y or z is of type 'void'.)
Let's first stipulate that z cannot be void here, as the context is you
want to evaluate to the result of some expression.
But why wouldn't a tuple of type (void, void, T) be valid?
Because 'void' is special. (Language design error imported from C.)
builtin tuples can be special too...
-Steve
