On 9/18/16 6:00 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yes. That's DIP 82:


I need to go over it again and then introduce it into the new DIP process.
But I really think that that's where we should go to fix this problem.

Just a thought: things that we can't do have high priority. Things that we can do with a modest cost are much less attractive. Consider:

struct Awesome(A, B, C)
    private enum ut = is(A == int) && is(B == int) && is(C == int);

    static if (ut) unittest

You're looking at an overhead with a small fixed cost plus a few characters ("if (ut)") per unittest.


Reply via email to