Dne 23.9.2016 v 09:39 Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 14:13:26 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Would be interesting to get some opinions on this.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1282
Bringing up this topic again b/c there was still almost no feedback on
the actual plan. Here is a summary.
- built-in AA is too magic to be replaced by library AA
- provide a general purpose library AA with enough benefits for people
to live with incompatibilities
- add a cheap toBuiltinAA adapter for compatibility of the library AA
with existing code
- make array and AA literals usable with UDTs
- slowly deprecated magic behavior of the built-in AA
- switch built-in AA to library AA
Also we should plan for a std.container.aa to deal w/ all the fancy
generic/specialized stuff.
What is wrong with built-in AAs? And what advantages comes with library AAs?
