So...umm...yea...whatever happened to that beefed-up "assert" feature?
What's up with the assert enhancements proposed years ago?
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:01:06 -0700
Some ages ago, a whole suite of "assertPred" functions were written
(giving better diagnostic info, like showing "expected vs actual"), were
totally awesome, were submitted to phobos...and were rejected because it
was deemed both easy enough and preferable to get these features by
modifying DMD to add behind-the-scenes AST magic to "assert".
- What's up with the assert enhancements p... Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
- Re: What's up with the assert enhan... Seb via Digitalmars-d
- Re: What's up with the assert e... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: What's up with the asse... Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
- Re: What's up with the ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- [OT] Stackless fib... Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
- Re: [OT] Stack... Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: [OT] S... Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
- Re: [OT] S... Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: [OT] S... Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
- Re: [OT] Stack... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d