On 09/23/2016 11:47 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 09/23/2016 07:57 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2016 16:57:49 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
So...umm...yea...whatever happened to that beefed-up "assert" feature?
[...]
Ugh, so, "It was rejected for being library instead of assert, then it
was rejected for being assert instead of library".
/facepalm
Guess I'll just have to try getting used to awful Java-isms like
x.notEqual(y) :(
And then that leads too, to the question of whether such third-party
asserts are a good idea for the doc unittests I like so much... :/
