On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 23:32:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Linking C libraries and object code into D programs has always
worked easily in D. The other way around, not so well.
[...]
Produces:
bar.o:(.eh_frame+0x13): undefined reference to
`__dmd_personality_v0'
bar.o: In function `_D3bar7__arrayZ':
bar.d:(.text._D3bar7__arrayZ+0x21): undefined reference to
`_d_arraybounds'
bar.o: In function `_D3bar8__assertFiZv':
bar.d:(.text._D3bar8__assertFiZv+0x21): undefined reference
to `_d_assert'
bar.o: In function `_D3bar15__unittest_failFiZv':
bar.d:(.text._D3bar15__unittest_failFiZv+0x21): undefined
reference to `_d_unittest'
bar.o: In function `__d_dso_init':
bar.d:(.text.d_dso_init[.data.d_dso_rec]+0x28): undefined
reference to `_d_dso_registry'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
How much of an issue is this with D? Is it something we need to
address?
This reminds me a huge clusterfuck encountered when trying to
link an interfaced version of libdparse in Object Pascal:
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,32340.msg208499.html#msg208499
Soon or later this will happen again. But the next time the guy
could completely give up and say "D is shitty".