On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 08:40:38 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 01:17:16 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/27/16 2:52 AM, Joakim wrote:
Why not? I think people will understand that ldc is meant
for higher
performance, which you want from such code anyway.
I'm not going to argue this much further. Essentially Mir is
touted as a highly generic and portable library. Having it
only work on one language implementation works against that
statement, the credibility of Mir, and the credibility of D as
an universal platform for creating fast code.
Just let dmd die.
This so-called "reference implementation" makes people suffer
because of code portability and another differences between the
compilers (e.g. compiler building, compiler's command line
arguments, compiler's extensions).
