On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 15:38 -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: > A more productive way forward is for you (and those who agree with > you) to > prepare a formal DIP and submit it. It's the way significant language > change > proposals are done.
But is the effort worth it? Will the DIP and PR be assessed? Does it have any chance of success? Is there any chance of this long standing position of D on overloading operators being overturned? Saying "Go prepare a DIP" is both indicating the right thing to do, but also a mechanism of deflecting the idea from having any chance of success at all. So does a well prepared DIP have a chance of changing D's operator overloading or not? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
