On 3 October 2016 at 00:08, Ethan Watson via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday, 2 October 2016 at 05:00:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >> >> We should create a file where the string-mixins are expanded, I agree. > > > Further to this. I tried generating .di files the other day for code based > on Binderoo. None of the mixins were expanded, which resulted in the > compiler needing to do all that work again anyway and negating the effect of > a precompiled library. > > If you get to doing that work, it would be fab if you could apply it to .di > generation. If not as the default, then at least as a switch I can provide > on the command line.
That's genius! :)
