I also chose Ilya's nanomsg over zeromq, there were some fundamental flaws in ZMQ that it addresses, and it is more flexible.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 04:18:55 UTC, Nikolay wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 11:53:05 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:e >> >> Has anyone wrapped Nanomsg? >>> >> >> Be aware - Nanomsg project is mostly dead now. See >> http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/ >> > > > Nanomsg is not dead. The maintainer tried to introduce a code of conduct > (about which even he was uncertain of the merits of), felt he didn't have > the effective power to do so, and then resigned in frustration. A few > weeks later he was back and it hit 1.0 recently. > Had an exchange with Pieter on Reddit and after looking at commit > history, he took back his suggestion that Nanomsg was dead. > > It's silly to compare the two communities and make any inferences because > Nanomsg has fewer people and the originator has a job and Google and many > interests. > > There are deimos bindings that Ilya wrote for me and I open-sourced, and > a wrapper that I wrote that is also open sourced. There are some bugs in > the deimos binding - haven't yet had time to push my changes. > > The wrapper isn't super well tested but I use it. Will make it more > polished when I have more time. > > > Laeeth >
