Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 14 de noviembre a las 14:59 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 14 de noviembre a las 10:36 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Does this makes more sense?
Yes.
It would be pushing to much to ask if you're willing to give it a serious
thought then? =)
I understand it (I think), but I'm not as keen on it as you are <g>.
Consider that D has function hijacking protection (I think this is
unique to D) so that inadvertent overloading by the same names in
different imports is virtually eliminated. So I think the marginal
benefit of the proposed changes is small.
I can see that it would be too much trouble for too little gain (from you
POV, I still think that readability is key for code-review, which
I consider key for high-quality code).
It seems to me that it is a code beautifier proposal. When your code is
completely working, you many run some kind of 'beautify' step. There are
many other beautifier processes that could be run. They improve the
productivity of the maintenance guys but I think it would be a severe
nuisance to be required to use them continuously during development.
