On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 17:59:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/12/2016 01:05 PM, safety0ff wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 16:48:36 UTC, safety0ff wrote:

Didn't see the LUT implementation, nvm!

Yah, that's pretty clever. Better yet, I suspect we can reuse the look-up table for front() as well. -- Andrei

The first results from stoke are in.
It turns out stoke likes to produce garbage :(
It's smallest result so far has around 100 instructions.
However it might get better if I give it a few more hours to explore.

Reply via email to