On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 20:47:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 13 October 2016 at 21:49:22 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
Bad benchmark! Bad! -- Andrei

Also, I suspect a benchmark with a larger loop body might not benefit as significantly from branch hints as this one.

I disagree in longer loops code compactness is as important as in small ones.

You must have misunderstood:

My thought was simply that with a larger loop body, LLVM might not make such dramatic rearrangement of the basic blocks.

Take your straw man elsewhere :-/

This is more correct : (Tough for some reason it does not pass the unittests)

You're only validating the first byte, current code validates all of them.

Reply via email to