===

TL;DR:
The proposed function takes an input range and an optional seed and provides an input range containing the intermediate results of the summation of the given range. As of 2.072 this behaviour can be emulated by cumulativeSum!((a, b) => a + b)(r, s), but cumulativeSum involves a specialization for accurate summation of floating point values and redirects to cumulativeFold for non-floating point values. The proposed function would be useful for those doing basic statistical analysis on data sets, but would also have applications in other fields. Please let me know in this thread whether you would have a use for this function (or if you think it should/shouldn't be in phobos)

===


I'd like to propose the function cumulativeFold as a new addition to std.algorithm.iteration. I have already opened a pull request [1] for this addition so the full implementation is available there. The function signatures are:

auto cumulativeSum(Range)(Range r)
if (isInputRange!Range && __traits(compiles, r.front + r.front))

auto cumulativeSum(Range, Seed)(Range r, Seed s)
    if (isInputRange!Range && __traits(compiles, s = s + r.front))

The function returns an input range that contains the intermediate results of a summation on all of the elements of a given range. For more details see Prefix Sum [2].


My motivation for adding this function to phobos was originally that I came across a need for it. I was looking into genetic algorithms and I wanted to implement some variation of the Stochastic Universal Sampling [3] selection method, which requires the fitness values of the population to be sorted and then selected based on the cumulative sum up to that point. Phobos was the first place I looked to for an implementation of cumulativeSum, as I knew that it had an implementation of sum, and cumulativeSum is a great use of D's ranges that I assumed would be in phobos. I couldn't find it, but found cumulativeFold instead. However, from reading the docs on sum, I knew that sum was a specialization of fold for accurate floating point summation, and given that I would be summing floating point values it would be better if the algorithm I used also involved this type of specialization.


With the knowledge that cumulativeFold is now in phobos, I realized that this presented quite an obvious gap in this area of summation and reduction. This gap is best illustrated by this table:

| Provides no intermediate results | Provides intermediate results -------------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------
 Not          |                                  |
specialized | fold | cumulativeFold
 for accurate |                                  |
 summation    |                                  |
-------------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------
 Specialized  |                                  |
for accurate | sum | X
 summation    |                                  |


So now what would people other than me use this function for, or in other words, why should it be in phobos? Firstly, from a purely logical point of view, cumulative sums can be a useful way of analysing data. Once the data can be converted into a cumulative sum, then it is trivial to know what the current running total is when consuming the data. IE rather than keeping state like so [trivial example]:

void displayDataset(Data)(Data d, double total)
{
    double sum = 0.0;

    while (true)
    {
        if (d.empty) break;
        sum += d.front;
        if (sum > total) break;
        writeln("Data point: ", d.front, ", sum: ", sum);
        d.popFront;
    }
}

Range based code can now be written with ease to perform the same job:

void displayDataset(Data)(Data d, double total)
{
    d
        .zip(d.cumulativeSum)
        .until!(t => t[1] > total)
.each!(t => writeln("Data point: ", t[0], ", sum:", t[1]));
}

Some other useful applications are:
- Graphing an integral of a range of y values without calculating the actual integral. - Computing a series summation with increasing accuracy (a la Fourier).
 - Keeping a running mean of incoming data.


Thanks for reading if you got this far, let me know whether you love/hate the idea.
P.S: its late here so I may only be able to read/respond tomorrow.

===

[1] https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4881
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix_sum
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_universal_sampling

Reply via email to