On 06/11/2016 1:57 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, November 05, 2016 01:21:48 Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I thought about it some more, and decided that I will replace the
old interpreter completely in the long run.
However in order to get something release before 2017, I have to
rely on it being there.
That seems reasonable, but it definitely seems messy to leave the old stuff
there in the long run, especially if only part of it is really used and
tested.
- Jonathan M Davis
Based upon some help I gave Stefan early on with the current
implementation, it will be left alone as is. It doesn't need to change
in any way beyond the entry point.
So not at all messy and it certainly is already well tested.
Especially since it is mostly localized to a single file.
