On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 20:51:01 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 20:15:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 18:40:03 Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 01:17:48 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
> After the bad news now a bit of good news.
> I just finished the strCat algorithm;
>
> [...]
As expected this code is slightly wrong and will fail on the
offset == 3 case.
It will need a little bit of tinkering until it's ready to go
:)
And aren't you glad that you have all of these unit tests to
verify that what you're working works properly? They don't
necessarily catch everything, but it would be _way_ worse to
completely replace something like this without them. :)
The way that D promotes unit testing is definitely one of its
strong points.
- Jonathan M Davis
I love compile-time unitests.
Who does not like them ?
The interpret3.d test in the compiler acceptance testsuite is
almost a work of art.
After you pass that one you can be pretty sure to have a
complainant d compiler.
The current Status of stringCat can be found here :
https://gist.github.com/UplinkCoder/fed000f5ca41ad3d65d59a7a63d5ef6f
StringConcat works and will be translated into bytecode soon.
I am going to get a few big things done during next week.
Namely support for dynamic arrays.
At least I hope so :) You never know what bugs might rain on your
programming parade.
