On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:38:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 16:28:30 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:45:29 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was wondering how much interest in static analysis exists
in this community .
DMD already has rudimentary support for these kinds of things.
cyclic complexity
NPath complexity
Halstead complexity
3 nice fields of static analysis.
I'm currently working on Halstead
(https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/blob/master/dastworx/src/halstead.d)
The Halstead metric (1977) is often considered as ratio of the
number of line code, while it's actually not at all. The
Halstead is based on the operations and the operations
arguments. You can have small functions using a lot of
operands that will be bug prone. You can have huge functions
with very few operands used and that are not bug prone. The
Halstead metric can detect them. It can tell you: "take care
of this function".
;]
I think you mixed up Pow and Xor.
You will probably want to change from a AA to a normal array
and just assign a numeric index to each expression you care
about :)
pffff you dont get the point.
The point is when an IDE message leads you to this:
http://imgur.com/a/6zLHU
