On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 09:35:31 UTC, Andrey wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 07:47:08 UTC, O-N-S wrote:
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 23:02:59 UTC, Benjiro wrote:
I split this from the "Re: A betterC modular standard
library?" topic because my response is will be too much
off-topic but the whole thread is irking me the wrong way. I
see some of the same argument coming up all the time, with a
level of frequency.
Five stars of five!
Regards, Ozan
Read all branche of topic. See ability to make social research.
Age'meter)))
Andrei,Walter > 45;
Benjiro,Dicebot 20-27;
others - difficult to say right now; need more time;
don't want to upset anyone, just a joke )))
How do you use language is more important than your age.
Scientist or AI developer expect highest performance for
number-crunching and don't care about fast and easy
development/deployment/etc. Devops (like me) don't care about
super-performance, but care about easy development (read -
libraries availabilty, easy debugging, etc) and deployment,
gamedev probably care about GC and I don't know what else.
Language core team can choose to care about every or only about
some specific categories of developers.
And one note on volunteer model of language development - it have
obvious pro and contra. how much this "contra" affect language
progress depends on the language creators and community goals.
