On 12/23/2016 02:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/23/2016 01:53 PM, Johan Engelen wrote:Perhaps I read this wrong but: the paragraph says that non-strongly-pure functions receive no special treatment, but then the next paragraph adds special treatment for a subset of non-strongly-pure functions... :)Fixed. Keep destruction coming. -- Andrei
Added:$(P Destructors will always be called even if they appear to be strongly pure.)
Any other special functions we should worry about? Andrei
