On Wednesday, 25 January 2017 at 20:22:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
It only matters if you're trying to define the range primitives
for your range as free functions for some reason. Just put them
on the type itself and be done with it. The only reason that
wouldn't work would be if you weren't in control of the code
for the type in question, and I'm inclined to think that
turning a type that isn't a range into a range using free
functions isn't the best of ideas. You can always wrap the type
in another type though if you really want to turn it into a
range and can't just because you're dealing with a pointer.
- Jonathan M Davis
Strings use std.range.primitives.
