On 1/29/2017 3:50 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
Why is `in` no longer the same as `const scope`?
Because it was unchecked and largely unimplemented. I was afraid that by checking it, too much code would break.
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:31:31 -0800
On 1/29/2017 3:50 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
Why is `in` no longer the same as `const scope`?
Because it was unchecked and largely unimplemented. I was afraid that by checking it, too much code would break.