On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 10:20:59 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote:
I thought it meant "the parameter can be returned" not "the parameter *will* be returned".
And what about multiple `return`-qualified function parameters?
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, and D Mike via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Ru... Mike via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C... ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Ru... Jaded Observer via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C... rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, and D Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, ... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, ... Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Ru... Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() compariso... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comp... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() ... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() ... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Ru... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, and D Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, ... John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Ru... Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d
- Re: memcpy() comparison: C, Rust, and D Richard Delorme via Digitalmars-d
