On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 12:26:14 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I am currently working on && again, So far I hit a curious situation when handling (b1 && b2 && b3) everything works fine except that b3 will be evaluated 3 times. It's a puzzler :)
I just reverted every change of last week I should have a clean building branch after that.
Tomorrow I will rewrite the removed functionality more cautiously.
