On Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:13:47 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Yea. Six years ago, assertPred was written for Phobos and rejected > because it was decided it was better for assert to just gain that > functionality built-in...which a full six years later, never happened. > Letting perfect be the enemy of the good, at its golden finest.
Well, to make matters more entertaining, it was later decided that it was unreasonable to alter assert to print the extra information that assertPred had. So, it's not even a case of no one doing it. It's a case of it being rejected, leaving us with neither solution. - Jonathan M Davis
