On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:38:24PM +0000, XavierAP via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > Also at least as of 2010 Andrei's book stated that "At the time of > this writing, SafeD is of alpha quality -- meaning that there may be > unsafe programs [@safe code blocks] that pass compilation, and safe > programs that don't -- but is an area of active development." And 7 > years later in this forum I'm hearing many screams for @nogc but > little love for @safe...
To be fair, though, in the past several months Walter has merged quite a number of PRs to dmd that close many of the holes found in @safe. I don't think we can say @safe is bulletproof yet, but it would be unfair to say that no progress has been made. T -- Leather is waterproof. Ever see a cow with an umbrella?
