On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 15:41:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yeah, I've never understood how it made any sense for opIndex to be used for slicing, and I've never used it that way.
Yeah, I just saw that yesterday in a Phobos type and was like "wtf did they misname it"... but it worked.
However, I can get used to it, [] going to opIndex() isn't really a stretch anyway, I would just like if it was better known and the compiler talked about it.
