On Saturday, 11 March 2017 at 19:07:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2017 15:25:14 bauss via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Are there any news on DIP88? Will it be implemented?, when?,
is there an implementation currently in development or?
https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
So, if someone cares enough, they can propose a new DIP for
named arguments, but I doubt that it would be accepted, and no
one has made the attempt regardless, so it definitely hasn't
been accepted as of now.
- Jonathan M Davis
I just wanted to chime in by saying that I like the syntax of the
proposal a lot. It's up to those making the decision about
whether this is approved or rejected but if this is decided to be
a language feature then the syntax presented is quite appealing.
