Re: Multi-commit PRs vs. multiple single-commit PRs
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:23:09 -0700
I'm a bit confused. This got settled a while ago, in part to avoid silly
debates over the inconsequential. Our organization prefers squash before
commit in the majority of cases. For a minority of pull requests (that
touch many files, are semi-mechanical etc) multiple commits in one PR
are fine within reason. These would be about one order of magnitude less
frequent. -- Andrei
- Re: Multi-commit PR... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Seb via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-comm... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Multi-commit PR... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: The delang is using merge instea... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
- Re: The delang is using merge i... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
