On 29/03/2017 1:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 at 11:22:59 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:Which is basically what you said.It isn't. version needs to be parsed and thus, grammatically valid.
Hmm, well that is another thing that could be disabled to shave some time off the build times I suppose.
