On 4/9/2017 1:16 AM, Daniel N wrote:
... but why not go all the way, making it "always" refcounted? (for any "new E", not emplace).
Backwards compatibility, for one. For another, a general mechanism for safe refcounting of classes has eluded us.
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d Sun, 09 Apr 2017 13:17:29 -0700
On 4/9/2017 1:16 AM, Daniel N wrote:
... but why not go all the way, making it "always" refcounted? (for any "new E", not emplace).
Backwards compatibility, for one. For another, a general mechanism for safe refcounting of classes has eluded us.