On 2017-04-11 04:11, Meta wrote:
I don't agree as you have to add `scope` for the class to be allocated on the stack.
It's enough to add "scope" when declaring the variable: scope foo = new Object; -- /Jacob Carlborg
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:58:05 -0700
On 2017-04-11 04:11, Meta wrote:
I don't agree as you have to add `scope` for the class to be allocated on the stack.
It's enough to add "scope" when declaring the variable: scope foo = new Object; -- /Jacob Carlborg