On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 22:36:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 10 April 2017 at 23:52, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 20:43:06 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Master sports Phobos 2.071. Someone will have to see whether
latter versions can be built using it.
… and some weird Frankensteinian mix of several frontend
versions, I take it, maybe enough to build Phobos, but not
necessarily compatible for user code? Or did you port all the
changes since 2.068.2 back to C++?
— David
All the regression fixes and none of the bugs!
The current situation is that it should be link-compatible with
current upstream/stable. Enough so that when someone has the
time to test, it should just be a case switching the sources
and building the D version.
First of all, thank you for your tremendous work on GDC! Fellow
developers and me were also pretty stunned by you maintaining a
quite large amount of different GDC versions in parallel without
a huge team - that's some impressive work!
What is the thing that's blocking GDCs GCC inclusion? Just
manpower? Also, you were talking about "bugs" on several
occasions, what's the thing with that? Is it GCC or general
Phobos bugs? It would probably be awesome to have a summary
blogpost or similar on the state of GDC, that could potentially
also attract volunteers.
Anyway, all a bit off-topic :-)
