On Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 15:37:14 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
It was a conscious decision to provide something simple to use,
over something which allowed more control (good old KISS). If a
use case for it develop in the future, the addition will be
trivial.
Well, it's not simple to use if it doesn't fulfil your use-case.
;-)
With that in mind, it would seem simpler overall to not make
assumptions about use-cases, and just allow the user a free
choice of what kinds of contract they disable:
--disable-contracts=invariant,in,out,assert,all
(Yes, I'm intentionally suggesting allowing
`--disable-contracts=in`, `--disable-contracts=out`, and
`--disable-contracts=in,out`.)
