On 15/04/17 00:09, Walter Bright wrote:

I read deadalnix's posts. I pointed out major unaddressed issues, like
how does it deal with an application using multiple independent methods
of allocating memory.

Do you have a link? I certainly think his direction rings of better engineering than the road you are trying to take right now, and I might try to pick it up myself.

Keep in mind that other languages, such as C++, will not even look at
any proposals that are not detailed and complete.

While nothing there is perfect, I don't agree with that point. Language changes are being proposed on the mailing list all the time. Many of them are very very very *very* far from being complete, and a discussion is what happens next. Very few of those ideas actually make it into proposals.

I'm not saying that the C++ way is perfect, or even necessarily better. Just that your point of comparison is stating incorrect facts.

Shachar

Reply via email to